Simply put the degree to which a tall citadel is a disadvantage has grown in real terms over time IMO. All of this produces a very real change in perceived durability on the user end and elevates one of the ships weaknesses a little bit more. And ofc the KM BB's will have pushed people to target the non-KM BB's even more as their a so much easier target. People have learned about vulnerabilities and adjusted their targeting appropriately. Now look at the high tier cruiser situation. Remember back in beta when most BB drivers advised not targeting cruisers because they were too hard to kill. The citadels certainly get a lot of credit, but it's a long way from the whole story.Įqually i think a lot of it is meta changes rather than KM BB's specifically that have transformed opinions on citadels. So it's very hard to get them into a bad situation in general terms beyond very obvious basic mistakes. The KM BB's are incredibly flexible as a whole, unless your trying to snipe from extreme range there's little they do poorly. Although what counts as flexible is very meta dependent. Flexibility is generally considered more useful than extreme's in one or two area's. I'm still trying to appreciate how this is a bad thing in people's minds. Expose your side and you'll get punished. I had a lot of success in Alabama (so much so that I mistakenly thought her accuracy was better than North Carolina, Iowa, Missouri and Montana). I'm still bitter about the DEBBs making citadel mechanics idiot proof - not so much for their inclusion, but how they've changed the culture and meta around what's an acceptable battleship and what isn't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |